[PATCH] ldconfig fix
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Fri Mar 16 02:17:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:00:06AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > This is what I had to add yesterday: it is perfectly normal to have
> > different osversions for one soname in the same library (say have
> > libc-2.2.1.so and libc-2.2.2.so in the same directory), we just must update
> > osversion from the library ld.so.cache will actually contain.
>
> I've applied this patch as well. Thanks,
BTW: Could you please also look at:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-03/msg00009.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-02/msg00132.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-02/msg00128.html
and either send me your objections against them or apply them?
Thanks.
Jakub
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list