binary incompatibility on SPARC ?
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Mon Jan 29 08:09:00 GMT 2001
On Mon, Jan 29, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can see the only difference is sysconf. The new libz
> > uses sysconf, the old one not. Could this be the problem ? Or is
> > there another function, which is binary incompatible if compiled
> > with LFS or not ?
> >
>
> I have been trying to track down this problem aswell. I've noted 5
> seperate segv's that went away with recompiles, and they all had zlib in
> common. I have not been able to pinpoint the problem, but as luck would
> have it, I have set aside today to try and pin this down.
It is not only libz, libslang has the same problems.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list