fmal and nexttowardl on alpha
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.de
Thu Apr 5 01:24:00 GMT 2001
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:05:43AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Stephen L Moshier <moshier@mediaone.net> writes:
> >
> > > >It's not only Alpha - it's all platforms that don't have long double,
> > > >e.g. also Sparc.
> > >
> > > Sparc has 128-bit long double, supported by gcc.
> >
> > In that case we should make that known for sparc32 (sparc64 does it
> > right already).
> >
> > Uli, Jakub, what do you think? Shall I commit this?
> No. long double is the same type as double on sparc32, until we change this.
Thanks for the explanation.
> But the change needs to be well thought out in order to preserve binary
> compatibility, similarly to PowerPC and Alpha.
> gcc-2.96-RH and 3.0/3.1 support -mlong-double-64 and -mlong-double-128
> command line switches (and -mlong-double-64 is the default) on sparc32, so
> the steps are basically:
> 1) glibc has to enforce gcc-2.96 and above on sparc32 in configure
> 2) all functions which touch long double (including stuff like printf etc.)
> need to be versioned
> 3) -mlong-double-128 has to be used, headers updated
>
> and once this is done, gcc configure can check whether glibc supports
> 128-bit long double and if yes, default to -mlong-double-128.
>
> I assume all of Sparc32, Alpha and PowerPC could be changed at once...
>
> So it is not that trivial.
I guess this is a task that can only be done when gcc 3.0 is out -
let's wait for some time.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list