elm 2.5.3 and glibc 2.1.93

[H . J . Lu]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 10:13:46AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> |> 
> |> It looks like elm 2.5.3 may check errno even when fcntl returns 0.
> 
> This is broken.  The value of errno is only defined if the syscall failed.
> 

Elm may be broken. But it is no excuse for glibc to mess with errno.


H.J.