signal/bsd_signal

[Ulrich Drepper]

Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:

> I haven't checked BSD, but my offhand guess would be that the bit
> would not be set in sa_mask as reported by sigaction after a signal
> call.

I have no possibility to check it and have to believe what I see.
Currently it's in favor of of adding the bit.  Also, I think to
remember that the signal wasn't automatically masked in early Unix
versions.  I.e., it would have been necessary to set the bit.  I might
be wrong but somebody will have to proof it.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------