Why was sysdeps/sparc/Subdirs

[Ulrich Drepper]

Greg McGary <greg@kayak.mcgary.org> writes:

> Speaking of `make dist', Make-dist seems unnecessarily hairy.  A
> couple weeks ago, I compared a dist tree with the list of all files
> under CVS.  The only dist files that weren't under CVS were po/*.
> There were about a dozen subtrees in CVS that weren't in dist, and
> another handful of individual files.  IMO, `make dist' would be more
> maintainable if we just derived the distribution-file list from a
> filtered list of the contents of CVS.

Ehm, this might be true for your environment.  I have hundreds of
files in my trees which are not distributed.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------