tst-aio - new version - reveals a bug in glibc

[Ulrich Drepper]

Mark Brown <bmark@us.ibm.com> writes:

> However, this statement has not been retracted or questioned in
> 1003.1-1996 or anywhere else -- the intent is that an aio_fsync()
> happens right when you ask for it, I guess.

This would be stupid and in general cannot be implemented this way.
If there is a request for the file descriptor running, why should it's
progress be hindered by processing the aio_fsync immediately?  Also,
if this would be the right interpretation, why should this function
exist since it's obviously the same as a simple fsync() call?

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------