tst-aio - new version - reveals a bug in glibc
Mark Brown
bmark@us.ibm.com
Thu Jul 27 13:00:00 GMT 2000
At 2:48 AM -0700 7/27/00, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>Meanwhile I'm a little bit more confident that implementation is not
>completely broken. There is one strange thing though: reading the
>current XPG6 draft it says for aio_cancel() that no fields but
>aio_fildes and aio_sigevent are used. This is strange since at least
>aio_reqprio should be used as well. Otherwise queuing the request is
>difficult. This wording is also not present in POSIX-1.
>
>Mark: it's probably something that has to be brought up in the AG.
The current draft (AG Draft 3) for aio_cancel(), nor the SUSv2 (UNIX98)
spec for aio_cancel() mention specific fields.
I'm not sure what document you are accessing...
Mark
--
-------------------------
Mark S. Brown bmark@us.ibm.com
IBM RS/6000 AIX System Architecture 512.838.3926 T/L678.3926
IBM Corporation, Austin, Texas
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list