PR libc/1635
Mark Kettenis
kettenis@wins.uva.nl
Mon Jul 17 17:14:00 GMT 2000
Sender: drepper@cygnus.com
Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)
X-fingerprint: BE 3B 21 04 BC 77 AC F0 61 92 E4 CB AC DD B9 5A
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Date: 17 Jul 2000 15:11:04 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl> writes:
> We'll need to add `getipnodebyname' to `inet/Versions' someday.
> However, the current implementation contains some bugs. I'm already
> working on those, and I'll provide a patch (including a test) in the
> near future. If you haven't added it by then, I'll included the
> `inet/Versions' patch too.
Well, these functions will go away. They don't solve the problems
they are designed to solve. I'm not convinced it's a good idea to add
the functions at all.
I'm surprised to hear that. Did I miss something? They're still
present in the Austin draft 3, and I haven't seen any traffick on the
Austin mailing list about them. And AFAIK RFC 2553bis
(draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2553bis) isn't amended/withdrawn either.
Anyway, if they're really going to be replaced, we definitely
shouldn't add them (remove getipnodybyaddr() again).
Mark
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list