The libgcc.so for glibc initiative

H . J . Lu hjl@lucon.org
Thu Jul 13 08:01:00 GMT 2000


On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:57:06AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > 
> > PS Personally I still think that the GCC team should do the
> > libgcc.so.  They control the interfaces.  If they cannot keep the
> 
> The problem is they don't know to do it right. They may screw things

That should be "they don't know how to do it right."

> up before we know it. I don't think glibc can afford it.
> 
> > interfaces (reasonably) stable this whole thing is doomed anyway.
> 
> That is the only thing I want from them.
> 
> > This really is a much greater challange than the simple technicalities
> 
> I know. I want to add another one which may interfere the stable ABI

That should be "I don't want to add another one".

> since they want to get libgcc.so to work on all taregts.
> 

I should have read it again before I sent it :-).


H.J.


More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list