The libgcc.so for glibc initiative
H . J . Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Thu Jul 13 08:01:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:57:06AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> >
> > PS Personally I still think that the GCC team should do the
> > libgcc.so. They control the interfaces. If they cannot keep the
>
> The problem is they don't know to do it right. They may screw things
That should be "they don't know how to do it right."
> up before we know it. I don't think glibc can afford it.
>
> > interfaces (reasonably) stable this whole thing is doomed anyway.
>
> That is the only thing I want from them.
>
> > This really is a much greater challange than the simple technicalities
>
> I know. I want to add another one which may interfere the stable ABI
That should be "I don't want to add another one".
> since they want to get libgcc.so to work on all taregts.
>
I should have read it again before I sent it :-).
H.J.
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list