[PATCH] sys/io.h and g++
Scott Bambrough
scottb@netwinder.org
Thu Jan 27 11:41:00 GMT 2000
Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> Scott Bambrough <scottb@netwinder.org> writes:
>
> |> This fix is fine, but I don't believe it should be necessary. The C++ parsing
> |> routines should recognize they are in an inline assembler construct and act
> |> accordingly. IMHO, this is a compiler bug.
>
> No, in C++ `::' is a separate token, that is different from `: :'.
>
I see your point, but the colon also acts as a delimiter between different parts
of the inline assembler statement; parts that are there explicitly for the
compiler's benefit. I think the compiler should be able to tokenize this
statement without regard to whitespace. I'll ask on the gcc list, cause I'm
curious what the correct answer is.
Scott
--
Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer
REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com
NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list