prototypes for nested functions

[Ulrich Drepper]

Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:

> This is a really stupid misfeature.  Requiring prior prototype declarations
> for nested or static functions defined with prototype definitions is idiotic.

Static functions don't need prototypes but I agree completely with the
nested function case.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------