syscalls question
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Thu Apr 13 12:50:00 GMT 2000
Andreas Jaeger <aj@oss.sgi.com> writes:
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list contains a definition for pipe.
> But for mips we do need the file from sysdeps/unix/mips/pipe.S
> instead. What's the proper way to fix this? We could move the pipe
> line to the linux specific architecture files. But is there a more
> elegant way of doing it?
This would be a bigger change than needed. Simply put
#include <sysdeps/unix/mips/pipe.S>
in
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/pipe.S
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list