syscalls question

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Thu Apr 13 12:50:00 GMT 2000


Andreas Jaeger <aj@oss.sgi.com> writes:

> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list contains a definition for pipe.
> But for mips we do need the file from sysdeps/unix/mips/pipe.S
> instead.  What's the proper way to fix this?  We could move the pipe
> line to the linux specific architecture files.  But is there a more
> elegant way of doing it?

This would be a bigger change than needed.  Simply put

	#include <sysdeps/unix/mips/pipe.S>

in

	sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/pipe.S

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------


More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list