Ideas for rewrite of libm-test
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@cygnus.com
Thu Sep 30 07:51:00 GMT 1999
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> But if we want to describe the overall error of a function, we should
> use relative errors like 2^-63.
Actually, the unit should be ULP (units of least precision). Take a
look at the libm test web page I've written
( http://www.cygnus.com/~drepper/libm/ ) to see how to compute it.
> Btw. I'd like to read a little bit more about this topic. I've read
> already a number of articles from the different ACM journals but if
> anybody has more pointers to relevant literature, please tell me.
The most important article is "What Every Computer Scientist Should
Know About FLoating-Point Arithmetic" by David Goldberg in ACM
Computing Surveys, March 1991. For testing "The UNIX System Math
Library, a Status Report" by Silverstein, Sommars, and Tao in Usenix
Winter '90 is interesting.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list