Time for glibc 2.1.2 final?
Andreas Jaeger
aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Sun Sep 5 22:15:00 GMT 1999
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:
Uli> Andreas Jaeger <aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de> writes:
>> what open problems do we have for a 2.1.2 release?
>> - the crt[ni].* problem Zack mentioned (this seems to be IMHO the only
>> show stopper)
Uli> This is no problem with the patch I added. As rth commented, I also
Uli> don't believe Zack's words that with the -march=i386 flag properly
Uli> used there is a problem.
To double check this, I updated my gcc installation with:
$ /opt/gcc-2.96/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from /opt/gcc-2.96/lib/gcc-lib/i486-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 19990905 (experimental)
I recompiled the current glibc 2.1.2 with that gcc and got
an error message when trying to execute any binary. For example:
aj@arthur: 07:07:48 /usr/glibc/src/buildreport/19990905
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:elf LD_DEBUG=all elf/ld.so string/tester
11249: file=string/tester; generating link map
string/tester: error in loading shared libraries: failed to map segment from shared object: Error 9
I compiled glibc without any special CFLAGS, just with the current CVS
gcc.
I don't know what's broken here. Anybody an idea how to debug this?
Has anybody been successfully build glibc with a recent gcc?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list