Why this change in manual/libc.texinfo?

Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Mon Mar 8 23:53:00 GMT 1999


>>>>> Geoff Keating writes:

>> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>

>> I have texinfo 3.12f.

Geoff> I can confirm that 3.12 does not work, and 3.12f does.

Geoff> Can we add this to the configure script?  And perhaps even get a 3.13
Geoff> texinfo release before glibc 2.1.1?

I'm against releasing a glibc 2.1.1 that depends on a texinfo
pre-release for no good reason.  I propose to revert the patch.  

AFAIK texinfo 3.12f would still compile that file (after reverting the
patch) - but perhaps with warnings - which would annoy only a few.
But leaving the change in would cause problems for most.

Please revert this patch - and if not, we've got to change the
configure test for makeinfo.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger   aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de    jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
  for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de



More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list