glibc2.1 [offtopic]

[H.J. Lu]

> >
> >It works for me. You never gave me a convincing example to show
> >it is broken. Maybe we have different opinions on what "broken"
> >means in this context.
> 
> "It works for me" != "it works for everyone".
> 
> You localized a bunch of symbols that have been in libgcc since GCC1
> and will never go away.  Things like _muldi3.  Those symbols are
> re-exported by libc.  We can't take them out without breaking every
> binary that needs them.
> 

I have compiled glibc 2.1 with my egcs 1.1.1/Linux and installed
it on several RedHat 5.2 systems. Can you tell me which binary I
should check?


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)