__const or const?

[Ulrich Drepper]

Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

> Shall I send you a new one next year?

I think I can handle this.  I'll apply the patch when I've checked in
everything I've changed here.

> I suggest to write up a small summary on the usage of keywords for
> glibc.  This should document at least __const and __THROW.  What else
> should we mention?  I can try to write something up.

Well, I'm not really sure this is necessary since the user has nothing
to do with this and the two rules should be easy to remember.
Actually, my main reason is that I don't know where to add this
without creating confusion.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------