anybody handling the LCK64 stuff?

[Andreas Jaeger]

>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:

 > Can anybody handle adding the LCK64 stuff?  I think it will have to be
 > similar to the truncate64 code where we fall back on the LCK methods
 > if the kernel is not supporting it.

The patch didn't go into 2.3.32 final - and it had some problems.

For Mips, the numbers were wrong.  There were duplicates:
#define F_GETLK         14
#define F_SETLKW64      14

And there were no defines and no structure for Sparc32.

Ok, let's wait for 2.3.33.  If it will be in 2.3.33, I make a patch.
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de