A static binary patch
Mark Kettenis
kettenis@wins.uva.nl
Tue Aug 24 08:47:00 GMT 1999
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: 24 Aug 1999 17:30:19 +0200
hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
|> >
|> > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
|> > From: hjl@varesearch.com (H.J. Lu)
|> >
|> > Here is a patch for glibc 2.2. It can be used to minimize the static
|> > binary size together with the c_stubs addon. You can use
|> >
|> > Mon Aug 23 17:22:53 1999 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
|> >
|> > * Makeconfig (FILE): Define.
|> >
|> > * Rules (%.out): Run $(FILE) on the binary before running it
|> > and don't use the dynamic linker if it is not dynamically
|> > linked.
|> >
|> > What is the point for these changes? And what do they have to do with
|> > reducing the size of static binaries? Please avoid becoming dependent
|> > on more external tools. Using `file' is a violation of the GNU coding
|> > standards.
|> >
|>
|> My c_stubs addon has tests linked statically. When you run "make check"
|> in c_stubs, it will try to run it with
|>
|> # ........./ld-linux.so.2 the_c_stubs_test .....
|>
|> Since the_c_stubs_test is linked statically, it doesn't work. If you
|> can find a better way to fix it, I will appreciate it.
How about extending the ld.so so that if it is called with a static binary
it just execve()s it?
Or use `ld.so --verify' to find out if it is a dynamic executable or not
instead of using `file'.
Mark
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list