glibc 2.0.8

[H.J. Lu]

> 
> hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
> 
> > I'd like to see glibc 2.0.8 to address this problem.
> 
> No way.
> 
> > We can just tar whatever on the glibc 2.0 branch in CVS and call it
> > glibc 2.0.8.
> 
> You know exactly that it isn't that easy.  2.0.x has far too many bugs
> that I ever would recommend it to be used.
> 

Anything in CVS is better than so called glibc 2.0.7, which some people
seem to think is working fine. I am not talking about fixing all bugs.
I just want to see egcs can co-exist with glibc 2.0.x.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)