[50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]

Philip Blundell philb@gnu.org
Sun Oct 25 07:18:00 GMT 1998


>Btw. I've seen some reports which indicated failure of glibc together
>with Linux 2.1.126.  I'd really appreciate if somebody could tell me
>if Linux 2.1.126 is broken or glibc2.

I'm looking into this now.  Linux 2.1.126 had some changes in binfmt_elf (part 
of the MIPS merge by the looks of things) that seem to cause the problem -- I 
just backed them out of my copy and all is well.  But on another machine I'm 
running plain 2.1.126 with an older glibc (2.0.95) and that seems alright as 
well.

p.





More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list