go for 2.1

[Zack Weinberg]

On Wed, 25 Nov 1998 23:42:06 +0100 (CET), Mark Kettenis wrote:
>   From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
>   Date: 25 Nov 1998 11:45:18 -0800
>
>   This is now the time you should speek up if something important is
>   missing.
>
>I'm not really happy with the defenition of `struct ucred' in
>`bits/socket.h'.  It uses the typical Linux ``I don't care about name-space
>pollution'' short names for its members.  NetBSD uses `struct
>sockcred' and its members have a sc_ prefix.  Maybe we should use

A prefix for the structure members is fine.  We should not use the
same struct tag as anyone unless it's the same structure (which it is
not, as far as I know).

zw