A miscompiled glibc 2.1?

H.J. Lu hjl@lucon.org
Thu Nov 19 13:46:00 GMT 1998

Previous message (by thread): subdir dependencies
Next message (by thread): Why put this patch?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

It seems that either there is a bug in glibc 2.1 981118 or
I somehow corrupted it. If a file, foo, dosn't exist, I got

# ls -l foo
ls: foo: <@#_r
              ÃƒÂ·ÃƒÂ¿Ã‚Â¿

Does anyone see it? I am running RedHat 5.1.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)

Previous message (by thread): subdir dependencies
Next message (by thread): Why put this patch?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list