A patch for nanosleep
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@cygnus.com
Tue Nov 17 20:03:00 GMT 1998
hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
> The problem is signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN). If you add it before
> fork, you will see the difference. I am not sure where the bug
> is.
There is no problem. POSIX explicitly says
3.3.1.3 [...]
(2) SIG_IGN -- ignore signal
[...]
(d) If a process sets the action for the SIGCHLD signal to SIG_IGN,
the behaviour is unspecified.
Your program is not POSIX compliant if it sets SIGCHLD to this value
and therefore the library need not be either.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list