malloc(0)
Matthias Urlichs
smurf@work.noris.de
Wed Jun 3 23:19:00 GMT 1998
Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:
>
> Ours is not the only system with this behavior, so programs with such
> problems have them regardless and will be fixed if anyone cares.
>
Some programs use autoconf or whatever to detect whether they need to check
for X!=0 before blindly calling assert((foo=malloc(X))!=0).
Since this check is then encased in the program's binary shrine, changing
libc behavior from under them isn't going to sit well with users.
--
Matthias Urlichs
noris network GmbH
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list