DWARF EH for PPC
Dale Scheetz
dwarf@polaris.net
Tue Dec 8 19:23:00 GMT 1998
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > As far as I know, libm.so in glibc 2.0.7 still exports register_frame:
> >
> > The Debian release called 2.0.7u was constructed from the 2.0.7-pre6
> > tarballs and originally had the __register_frame_info symbol defined in
> > libm. Starting with release 2.0.7u-6 this symbol was removed using the
> > patch that was applied to the 2.1 pre-release.
> >
>
> So Debian applied a patch for glibc 2.1 on glibc 2.0? That explains
> why Debian's glibc 2.0 is different from the real glibc 2.0.
>
The "real" glibc 2.0 is different than any of the other "real" glibc 2.0
pre-releases. Are you suggesting that this behaviour is correct?
Waiting is,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list