DWARF EH for PPC

Dale Scheetz dwarf@polaris.net
Tue Dec 8 19:23:00 GMT 1998


On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, H.J. Lu wrote:

> > > 
> > > As far as I know, libm.so in glibc 2.0.7 still exports register_frame:
> > 
> > The Debian release called 2.0.7u was constructed from the 2.0.7-pre6
> > tarballs and originally had the __register_frame_info symbol defined in
> > libm. Starting with release 2.0.7u-6 this symbol was removed using the
> > patch that was applied to the 2.1 pre-release.
> > 
> 
> So Debian applied a patch for glibc 2.1 on glibc 2.0? That explains
> why Debian's glibc 2.0 is different from the real glibc 2.0.
> 
The "real" glibc 2.0 is different than any of the other "real" glibc 2.0
pre-releases. Are you suggesting that this behaviour is correct?

Waiting is,

Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-   Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide"  _-_-_-_-_-_-

aka   Dale Scheetz                   Phone:   1 (850) 656-9769
      Flexible Software              11000 McCrackin Road
      e-mail:  dwarf@polaris.net     Tallahassee, FL  32308

_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-




More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list