[PATCH] x86: Don't left shift negative values

[Collin Funk]

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:

>> -                          count_mask = ~(-1 << (count_mask + 1));
>> +                          count_mask
>> +                            = ~((unsigned int) -1 << (count_mask + 1));
>
> Why not just:
> count_mask = ~(-1u << (count_mask + 1));

I agree that is better, thanks. Let me send a v2.

Collin