Re: Nominations for Anthropic’s Claude for Open Source program
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 21:19:41 GMT 2026
On 6/12/26 7:12 PM, Sam James wrote:
> .. but also, I think we probably need to have a policy discussion about
> this. I hope we won't have anyone pasting LLM replies onto bugs or patch
> review, or an automated process doing that. I would *not* want to see
> something like Sashiko for example. It would seriously put me off
> contributing to glibc and I don't think it is respectful of
> contributors' time who have come to us with a bug report or patch.
100% agreed.
> We should discuss this I think before handing out access.
That's a good point.
> Now, if a maintainer wants to use it to aid their review (with great
> care), that may be more acceptable.
I absolutely agree that we need an AI policy for glibc ASAP.
I'm even happy to put in place stop-gap while the WG for GCC AI policy makes a first draft.
As a stop-gap I'd put up a "no LLM contributions accepted" policy in place.
We are also waiting on the GNU Project to finish policy review.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list