CTI - Making a decision for glibc.
Collin Funk
collin.funk1@gmail.com
Fri Jan 30 02:48:02 GMT 2026
Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> writes:
> On Jan 29, 2026, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> should we have just paid Codeberg e. V. for hosting?
>
> Forge hosting is extremely likely to be SaaSS if done by a third party.
>
> If you wanted to claim honestly to be in line with Free Software values
> and policies or whatever word you used in your claim, you shouldn't even
> be considering a SaaSS arrangement. It should have been unfathomable.
Codeberg e.V is a non-profit [1]. Maybe by "paid", Carlos probably meant
something like setting up a recurring donation to make sure they are
supported.
Codeberg generally only allows projects with free software licenses [2],
and explicitly recommends picking one from the GPL family [3].
A few GNU projects have started to use it after the unfortunate DDoSing
situation Savannah has to deal with.
Collin
[1] https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/
[2] https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#can-i-host-content-without-a-free-and-open-source-license%3F
[3] https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/licensing/#recommendations-for-software%2C-hardware-and-other-projects
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list