Unpopular opinion (Re: CTI - Making a decision for glibc.)
Joseph Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 22:06:36 GMT 2026
On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> My main complaint is "meta". We have an IMHO good structure to manage
> the services and hosting. I don't see a reason to add a completely
I'm concerned with service isolation for security - meaning isolation for
the existing services. I haven't seen progress on that arising from the
existing structures since I raised it as a serious issue at Cauldron 2022
- whereas in CTI, for example, we've done and published all the analysis
of existing services and their interactions that's a necessary
prerequisite of having properly isolated services. A huge amount of the
work done on Sourceware has been necessary *simply to stay in the same
place* (for example, migrating the existing services, with their existing
lack of isolation, to a new server) - and that sort of routine move
between different hardware seems like exactly the kind of thing it makes
sense to contract out to people who do it routinely rather than having it
take up community time and thought.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list