CTI - Making a decision for glibc.

[Jeffrey Law]

On 1/27/2026 8:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2026, Jeffrey Law<jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Erhm.  It was a bad idea before, and nothing has improved to make this
>>> hostile takeover less unpalatable, only more lies have been added on top
>>> to try to force it through.
>> Sigh, there is no change in control, hostile takeover or hostile
>> parties involved here.
> Oh, so who'd be in charge of rendering the services and thus controlling
> the servers, the computing they do and the data they hold, if not an
> organization that has always been hostile to GNU?
That's not a change in control of the project or a hostile takeover.  
The project still controls development, project policies, releases, etc 
etc.  LF IT is providing a service that the project has chosen to 
utilize.  The project still retains control over itself, including the 
possibility of moving away from LF IT if the project decides that's 
what's best.

> Then maybe let me shoot myself in the foot?  Why do you care?
I care because I have always respected you skills as a developer and I 
would rather have you involved in a positive way with development 
efforts rather than off in another world where the project doesn't 
benefit from your skills.  But the tone of your message makes it clear 
to me that we can't have a constructive discussion on this topic.  
  That's unfortunate.

jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20260127/d38ca6b0/attachment.htm>