[PATCH v2] linux: Enforce zero fill of siginfo_t

[Yury Khrustalev]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jan 27 2026, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
> 
> > I agree that memset is probably better here. It's unknown where the
> > struct definition might come from. If a kernel header is used somehow,
> > pad is not first in there:
> 
> The layout of the union doesn't matter.
>

Yes, mea culpa.

A compiler would probably call memset anyway (given the size of
128 bytes). Using `{0}` does look neat, but then this test is
susceptible to compiler bugs. Using memset explicitly should be
a good option for a test?

Thanks,
Yury