Potential glibc 2.43 regression on big-endian targets

[Sam James]

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2026-08-23 at 06:51 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On Sat, 2026-08-22 at 16:23 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
>> > I run tests on powerpc64/powerpc32 from time to time on cfarm121 and I haven't
>> > see any other than the usual regressions [1][2]. Did it started with 2.43?
>> 
>> Yes, I'm quite confident that it started with 2.43.
>
> I just noticed the following message on the kernel buffer, it might be related:
>
> [ 1814.130181] cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in /system.slice/cron.service

I am not seeing this yet. This sounds a bit like some system-wide limits
gone haywire?

https://serverfault.com/questions/1032747/cgroup-fork-rejected-by-pids-controller
mentions something like it too.

>
> Adrian

sam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20260823/021ea851/attachment.sig>