[PATCH] manual: remove misplaced time_t note from _FILE_OFFSET_BITS [BZ #34095]

[Mark Harris]

Shamil Abdulaev wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clarification — I missed the transitive dependency.
>
> Does this mean you consider BZ #34095 invalid as well?  Should I close the bug and withdraw the patch?

I added my reply there.  I don't think it's valid except to the extent
that it indicates that people are confused by the existing wording,
which may mean that the wording could be improved.

 - Mark