glibc AI policy

[Florian Weimer]

* Jeffrey Law:

> On 4/2/2026 12:56 PM, Collin Funk wrote:
>> DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Given that GNU is a USA-based project, and that the copyright status of
>>> AI in the USA is still... "nebulous at best"... it might take time to
>>> figure out whether or not we can accept that first AI patch that comes
>>> along.  Better to take that time now so we can respond more quickly
>>> then.
>> The copyright situation is the reason I am against tentatively accepting
>> patches while waiting for a more official policy from the FSF. Thanks
>> for mentioning that.'

> Yea, that's where I'd land as well.  Until the copyright situation is 
> better understood I would not accept any LLM generated code that is 
> outside the de-minimis guidelines set by the FSF.

Has the FSF communicated this (not accepting LLM-generated
contributions for now) to the glibc stewards?  Why would the
de-minimis guidelines apply, anyway?  I assume those are about not
diluting the copyright assignment, but that's hardly a concern for GNU
components accepting contributions under the DCO.