[PATCH 5/5] x86: Define atomic_compare_and_exchange_{val,bool}_acq using __atomic_compare_exchange_n

[Wilco Dijkstra]

Hi Uros,

>> However, it looks that after [1] gets committed, these macros should
>> be removed from target headers.
>>
>> I will wait a couple of days for dust to settle, and I'll respin the series.
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2025-September/169942.html
>
> I think it should be fine, I working on top of the Wilco patches to cleanup
> even more internal atomic builtins and I think both patchsets do not
> interfere with each other.

My patch series has gone in, so these definitions are now redundant: 

#define atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq(mem, newval, oldval)        \

#define atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq(mem, newval, oldval)       \

#define atomic_exchange_acq(mem, newvalue) \

#define catomic_exchange_and_add(mem, value) \

Cheers,
Wilco