[PATCH 5/5] x86: Define atomic_compare_and_exchange_{val, bool}_acq using __atomic_compare_exchange_n

[Uros Bizjak]

On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM Adhemerval Zanella Netto
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/09/25 09:38, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
> > Cc: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
> > Cc: H.J.Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
>
> LGTM, thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

Thanks!

However, it looks that after [1] gets committed, these macros should
be removed from target headers.

I will wait a couple of days for dust to settle, and I'll respin the series.

[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2025-September/169942.html

Uros.