[PATCH v2 2/2] Simplify powl computation for small integral y [BZ #33411]

[Joseph Myers]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:

> On 2025-10-21 08:45, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2025, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/math/test-powl.c b/math/test-powl.c
> > 
> > It's odd to use what's essentially a legacy test here rather than putting
> > the new test input into auto-libm-test-in, given that testing for spurious
> > overflow is fully handled in the auto-libm-test machinery without needing
> > special-case C code for a particular test.
> 
> Oh I chose this because auto-libm-test-in doesn't seem to have any powl
> inputs.  It does get tested indirectly through pown and friends though; would
> you suggest I add it as a test for pown or should I add it for powl?

All entries in auto-libm-test-in list the base name of the function, so 
"pow" covers pow, powf, powl, powf32, powf64, powf128, powf32x and 
powf64x.  See the comment at the top of gen-auto-libm-tests.c for details 
of the format.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com