[PATCH] Add threaded variants of single-threaded malloc tests

Mark Wielaard mark@klomp.org
Wed Nov 5 20:57:05 GMT 2025


Hi DJ,

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 02:54:19PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com> writes:
> > I would wait for more opinions from the original thread before putting
> > things down in writing [1]. I haven't read the final binutils one yet.
> 
> That discussion was paused pending a discussion at Cauldron.  Did that
> discussion happen?

There was a lot of discussion around LLMs at the
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2025#Licensing_Birds_of_a_Feather
Nick asked a lot of questions :)

I like the binutils LLM policy, except for the "Generated-By:"
part. It is IMHO super confusing to demand that for patches that are
only acceptable because they are not legally significant.

I do actually think it would be good to have a policy on
machine/script/tool assisted/generated patches to make clear how a
patch can be regenerated. But IMHO that should be a separate policy
and discussion (and probably one that LLM generated patches cannot
comply with because they cannot easily be regenerated).

Cheers,

Mark


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list