speed_t on Hurd (POSIX violation)

[H. Peter Anvin]

On May 12, 2025 3:11:43 PM PDT, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@aquilenet.fr> wrote:
>H. Peter Anvin, le lun. 12 mai 2025 14:49:27 -0700, a ecrit:
>> On 5/12/25 14:06, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > > The above types shall be all unsigned integer types.
>> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > > 
>> > > Should this be fixed
>> > 
>> > Yes we should fix this.
>> > 
>> > > (possibly including a range check if the kernel interface doesn't
>> > > support values above INT_MAX)?
>> > 
>> > The RPC interface just uses the speed_t type actually.
>> 
>> As in it picks up speed_t from glibc?
>
>Yes.
>
>Samuel

Another question: should the speed_t constants be explicitly unsigned?