speed_t on Hurd (POSIX violation)

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 5/12/25 14:06, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>
>> The above types shall be all unsigned integer types.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Should this be fixed
> 
> Yes we should fix this.
> 
>> (possibly including a range check if the kernel interface doesn't
>> support values above INT_MAX)?
> 
> The RPC interface just uses the speed_t type actually.
> 

As in it picks up speed_t from glibc?

	-hpa