[musl] Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) should be consistent with malloc(0)

[Thorsten Glaser]

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, enh wrote:

>not when POSIX screwed up and made a change that made most of the
>existing implementations non-conformant, no. that sounds like a POSIX

“most of”?

Looks to me like most implementations already do the latter,
and some might do the former, and only a minority (the three
mentioned earlier) don’t.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
 seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
 seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
	-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2