[PATCH v2] elf: Add optimization barrier for __ehdr_start and _end
Alexander Monakov
amonakov@ispras.ru
Mon Jun 16 06:42:54 GMT 2025
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 09:23:49AM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > But you are applying it after the assignment into _dl_rtld_map, which is too
> > late. As written, it doesn't prevent vectorization. I think Jakub's suggestion
> > was to use an asm to implement a non-transparent copy of the value (before use).
>
> That is indeed what I meant initially, but I think "+g" on the memory is
> actually better, it does prevent vectorization of the stores because one
> address has to be stored before the other one, but in a way which will allow
> on some architectures e.g. direct store of the __ehdr_start address to the
> memory.
The patch is
_dl_rtld_map.l_map_start = (ElfW(Addr)) &__ehdr_start;
+ asm ("" : "+g" (_dl_rtld_map.l_map_start));
_dl_rtld_map.l_map_end = (ElfW(Addr)) _end;
+ asm ("" : "+g" (_dl_rtld_map.l_map_end));
Computing the address of _end is independent of storing into l_map_start, so
this is functionally identical to
_dl_rtld_map.l_map_start = (ElfW(Addr)) &__ehdr_start;
_dl_rtld_map.l_map_end = (ElfW(Addr)) _end;
+ asm ("" : "+g" (_dl_rtld_map.l_map_start));
+ asm ("" : "+g" (_dl_rtld_map.l_map_end));
and hence vectorization of stores is not prevented.
Alexander
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list