[PATCH v5.2 12/12] linux/termios: regression test for termios speed functions

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 6/2/25 17:09, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 6/2/25 16:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I think I found the problem: the definition of CIBAUD on Alpha was
>> completely broken (to the extent that I have no idea how it got to be
>> that way.) I added a series of #ifs to speed.c to error out if CBAUD,
>> CIBAUD and IBSHIFT are inconsistent or violate the assumptions that I
>> used to optimize speed.c.
>>
>> I will post a v6 shortly.
>>
> 
> I just posted the v6, but I triple goofed:
> 
> 1. I managed to mess up so the cover letter didn't have a subject;
> 2. I didn't add you to the Cc: list proper,
> 3. I mistyped your email in the Reviewed-by: in the first patch.
> 
> My apologies, but the actual code should be sound :-/
> 


N.B.: I did fix the Reviewed-by: tag in the git repository; no other
changes.
	-hpa