[PATCH v5 00/12] termios: support arbitrary baud rates on Linux, minor cleanups, proposed alternative interface

Adhemerval Zanella Netto adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Mon Jun 2 12:39:44 GMT 2025



On 02/06/25 07:54, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin:
> 
>> On 5/14/25 15:13, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> This is the arbitrary baud rates on Linux patchset, and the (proposed)
>>> "explicitly true baudrate" interface proposed for future
>>> standardization, and is the first version I consider merge quality.
>>>
>>> It also includes some generic cleanups to the best of my ability, and
>>> removes USE_OLD_TTY from Hurd, which was the only remaining cause of
>>> speed_t not being an actual baud rate.
>>>
>>> A git tree is also available at:
>>
>> [updated]
>> https://git.zytor.com/linux/glibc/ branch termios-for-2.42-250521
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I hope I'm not being a pest, but being a greenhorn with respect to the
>> glibc workflow I'm wondering if there is any action that I need to take
>> at this point, or if I just should sit down and be patient.
> 
> I see that Adhemerval has begun reviewing this series (thanks!).  Do you
> need anything from me at this point?

I am reviewing the v5.2, which I think it is the same as this one but reseend
as a ping.  I just sent a strace on alpha, which on my testing is the only
ABI where the new test fails.


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list