[PATCH 0/6] Re: glibc: Add SFrame support for stack backtracing

[Adhemerval Zanella Netto]

On 15/07/25 13:27, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> On 2025-07-15 3:42 a.m., Claudiu Zissulescu-Ianculescu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like is this one:
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32298
>>
>> But let's wait Indu input,
>> Claudiu
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Looks like this one: //sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297
> 
> Some of the other known issues affecting glibc builds are listed here https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/sframe#Support_SFrame_based_stack_tracing_in_glibc_backtrace
> 
> BTW, moving forward, since in Binutils 2.45 we are generating SFrame section with a new type SHT_GNU_SFRAME (previous versions were emitting section type SHT_PROGBITS), we need to encourage users to start using Binutils 2.45.
> 

So we need to either disable SFRAME when building glibc with a broken
binutils and/or backport theses fixes on the affected binutils branches.