[PATCH v2 0/5] termios: _SPEED_MAX and _BAUD_MAX, manual improvements

[Adhemerval Zanella Netto]

On 10/07/25 23:50, Collin Funk wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> 
>> Ping on this patchset?
>>
>> It would really be useful if the baud_t interfaces can be
>> conditionalized on #ifdef _BAUD_MAX, as well as, of course, being able
>> to rely on the range.  It would make the legacy infill code I am
>> working on be far less compiler dependent.
>>
>> Thanks!
> 
> Just to clarify, I signed Reviewed-by for patch 1/5 and 2/5 since they
> are simple documentation fixes. You know much more about terminals than
> I do, so I am not super comfortable reviewing the others. :)
> 
> I'll post a comment on 4/5 though.

We are on hard-freeze for now, so I will postpone install theses patches 
to 2.43 even though they are documentation ones.  We just hit a gcc build
regression on recent termios cleanup [1], which most likely we will need
to revert.

[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2025-July/168626.html