[PATCH v6 3/5] aarch64: Add SFrame support for aarch64 architecture

[Wilco Dijkstra]

Hi Adhemerval,

> I think it is fine for assembly routines, as we do on multiple implementation
> for aarch64, but I think we should avoid adding UB on C code even though
> the architecture does allow it.  A packet or memcpy wrapper generates the
> same code and plays better with tools like UBSAN (if we eventually add
> support for it).

Where you see UB exactly? It's all aligned.

Cheers,
Wilco