[PATCH] misc: fix some typos

[Yury Khrustalev]

* Florian

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 10:10:27AM +0000, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
> ---
>  config.h.in                      | 2 +-
>  elf/elf.h                        | 2 +-
>  include/link.h                   | 2 +-
>  manual/dynlink.texi              | 6 +++---
>  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/Makefile | 2 +-
>  5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> ...
> 
> diff --git a/manual/dynlink.texi b/manual/dynlink.texi
> index 1e99a5aab3..a78a065af4 100644
> --- a/manual/dynlink.texi
> +++ b/manual/dynlink.texi
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ These are additional items for the i386 and x86-64 architectures, as
>  described below.  They mostly contain raw data from the CPUID
>  instruction.  The probes are performed for each active CPU for the
>  @code{ld.so} process, and data for different probed CPUs receives a
> -uniqe @var{index} value.  Some CPUID data is expected to differ from CPU
> +unique @var{index} value.  Some CPUID data is expected to differ from CPU
>  core to CPU core.  In some cases, CPUs are not correctly initialized and
>  indicate the presence of different feature sets.
>  
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ and @var{ecx_limit} (inclusive).
>  
>  @item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].ecx_query_mask=0xff
>  This line indicates that in an @samp{.until_ecx} range, the CPUID
> -instruction preserved the lowested 8 bits of the input @code{%rcx} in
> +instruction preserved the lowest 8 bits of the input @code{%rcx} in
>  the output @code{%rcx} registers.  Otherwise, the subleaves in the range
>  have identical values.  This special treatment is necessary to report
>  compact range information in case such copying occurs (because the
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ If the dynamic segment contains a (deprecated) @code{HASH} tag, it
>  must also contain a @code{GNU_HASH} tag.
>  
>  @item
> -The @code{INITFIRST} flag (undeer @code{FLAGS_1}) should not be used.
> +The @code{INITFIRST} flag (under @code{FLAGS_1}) should not be used.
> 

It's just a few typos, but would you be able to look at the changes in
dynlink.texi?

Thanks,
Yury